-
You must be logged in to Tag Records
Design for the capital city of Australia birds eye view. [Competitor no. 39] [cartographic material]
Bib ID 1967706
Format MapMap, OnlineOnline
Online Versions
Scale Scale not given (E 149°08'/S 35°18') 
Description [1912] 
1 ms. map : col., 62 x 97 cm. 
Notes

Competitor 39 is unknown; no sealed envelope including the name was received by the Competition.

Handcoloured ms. plan by competitor 39, for Canberra shows a birds eye view of the proposed city, south of the river.

Associated maps: Sheet 1, [ Federal Capital Designs Competition plan competitor no 39] : [on base map] map of contour survey of the site for the Federal Capital of Australia ; Sheet 2, Plan for the Capital City of the Commonwealth of Australia ; Sheet 3, Sections or scale of 400 feet to 1 inch ; Sheet 4 and 5, Central Avenue from Camphill northwards.

Also available in an electronic version via the Internet at: http:/­/­nla.gov.au/­nla.map-gmod47

Subjects Federal Capital Design Competition, - (1911-1925) - Aerial views.  |  City planning - Australian Capital Territory - Aerial views.  |  Australia - Capital and capitol - Aerial views.  |  Canberra (A.C.T.) - Historical geography - Aerial views.
Time Coverage 1912 
Form/genre Aerial views.

To learn more about copyright and requesting copies watch this short online video Help Video.
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Members of Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and Maori communities are advised that this catalogue contains names and images of deceased people. All users of the catalogue should also be aware that certain words, terms or descriptions may be culturally sensitive and may be considered inappropriate today, but may have reflected the author's/creator's attitude or that of the period in which they were written.