Sustainable development and intergenerational equity : issues relevant to India and globally / by Clement A Tisdell
- Bib ID:
- 5249953
- Format:
- Book
- Author:
- Tisdell, C. A. (Clement Allan), 1939-
- Description:
-
- Brisbane, Qld. : School of Economics, University of Queensland, 2010
- 19 p. : ill. ; 30 cm.
- Series:
- Working papers on economics, ecology and the environment ; no. 174.
- Summary:
-
As outlined, recurring concerns have surfaced since the 1700s that economic growth may prove to be unsustainable. These concerns have been expressed again and have intensified in recent decades but their foundation differs from that of Malthus. The repid economic growth of China and India have added to these worries. Recent discussions by economists of the desirability of achieving sustainable economic development have mainly focused on measures to attain intergenerational equity in resource use and the dominant view is that each succeeding generation should be at least as well-off as its predecessor. While this is said to be an implication of Rawls' principle of justice, this dominant rule does not fully reflect Rawls' principle and it can violate the Paretian improvement criterion. However, the full application of Rawls' principle leads to questionable results. For example, it assumes a greater degree of risk-aversion that seems likely in practice and it ignores the importance of intergenerational altruism, for example, the sacrifices that parents willingly make for their children. Rawls' principle also displays cosmological bias which results in it being at odds with the teachings of Hinduism and Buddhism. The mainstream stance on sustainable economic development does not appose economic growth. However, another neo-Malthusian point of view, expressed for example by Daly and Georgescu-Roegen, does. It is opposed to an increase in levels of global material production, that is, increased throughput of natural resources for economic production. These views are given some attention. Even if there is agreement about what constitutes a desirable path for economic development, uncertainty limits the scope for identifying measures that will achieve it. That raises the question of how far into the future should existing generations attempt to sustain economic development. This is discussed. In conclusion, it is pointed out that the nature of market systems and international relations make it very difficult to implement policies that can significantly reduce global economic growth and foster sustainable economic development. These problems are global problems and no country, India and China included, can afford to ignore them.
- Notes:
-
- "December 2010".
- Includes bibliographical references (p. 15-16)
- Subject:
- Other authors/contributors:
- University of Queensland. School of Economics
- Copyright:
-
In Copyright
You may copy under some circumstances, for example you may copy a portion for research or study. Order a copy through Copies Direct to the extent allowed under fair dealing. Contact us for further information about copying.
Copyright status was determined using the following information:
- Material type:
- Literary Dramatic Musical
- Published status:
- Published
- Publication date:
- 2010
Copyright status may not be correct if data in the record is incomplete or inaccurate. Other access conditions may also apply. For more information please see: Copyright in library collections.
Request this item
Request this item to view in the Library’s reading room.
Feedback
Similar items
- Fairness and futurity : essays on environmental sustainability and social justice / edited by Andrew Dobson
- Building intergenerational capacity [electronic resource] : a national study of intergenerational programs
- Sedaikan kōryū ni kansuru chōsa kenkyū hōkokusho
- Community planning for intergenerational programming / by Catherine Ventura-Merkel, Lorraine Lidoff
- Unto the thousandth generation : conceptualizing intergenerational justice / Bruce Edward Auerbach