National Library of Australia

Reopening Update - August 2020: Enjoy a CovidSafe visit to the National Library. Read more...

You must be logged in to Tag Records
A Feasibility Study on the Model Elementary Teacher Education Program, Phase II [microform] : Vol. II. Final Report
Bib ID 5212231
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Author
Massachusetts Univ., Amherst
 
Online Versions
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1970 
291 p. 
Summary

The second volume of the study contains the sections on management feasibility and economic feasibility, which comprise more than two-thirds of the document, and sections on simulation modeling, client acceptability, inservice design, evaluation, and maintaining relevance of the model for teacher education in the 1970's. The section on management feasibility describes the administration arrangements that have been conceived to accomodate the program and the steps that will be taken to implement these arrangements. The section on economic feasibility presents a 5-year budget outline, with breakdowns for each program subsystem. It identifies an optimally feasible number of students, proficiency modules, and instructional alternatives. The section on simulation gives a brief description of the simulation models used and their respective functions, and the section on client acceptability relates the use of several methods to gather opinions on the model--questionnaires, conferences, and the Delphi Technique. The section on inservice design contains the results of a survey made by the Massachusetts Center for the Study of Educational Innovations to assess the inservice needs of Massachusetts teachers. Subsequent sections briefly describe plans for evaluating and continuously updating the model. (Volume I of the study is SP 004 259 and a separate summary is SP 004 261.) (RT)

Notes

Availability: Supt. of Docs., Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (HE5.87:M72/2, Vol. 1&2, $4.50).

Contract Number: OEC-0-9-310417-4040(010).

ERIC Note: Phase 2, Feasibility Study, CETEM.

Sponsoring Agency: Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. Bureau of Research.

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: https://eric.ed.gov/

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Elementary School Teachers.  |  Inservice Teacher Education.  |  Program Costs.  |  Program Evaluation.  |  Relevance (Education)  |  Simulation.  |  Feasibility Studies.  |  Models.  |  Preservice Teacher Education.  |  Program Budgeting.  |  Teacher Education.  |  Comprehensive Elementary Teacher Education Models
Other authors/contributors Massachusetts Univ., Amherst
Available From ERIC 

Online

In the Library

Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

Details Collect From
mc 2253 ED043583 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

Order a copy

- Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.