National Library of Australia

Enjoy a CovidSafe visit to the National Library. Read more...

You must be logged in to Tag Records
Application of an Instructional Evaluation for University College [microform] / Pietro J. Pascale and Clarence A. Dittenhafer
Bib ID 5239239
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Author
Pascale, Pietro J
 
Online Versions
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1972 
24 p. 
Summary

In this document, two evaluations of college instruction models are proposed. Model A, a very objective summative evaluation is made utilizing behavioral objectives. The evaluating committee secures copies of the instructor's course examination. The evaluation committee will analyze the examination from the standpoint of instructional emphasis, i.e., content, critical thinking, etc. After the examination is given, the instructor will score the students' responses and assign grades. The instructor will pass the examination on to the evaluation committee where student responses will be analyzed in relation to the course objectives as inferred by the committee from examination of the test. The committee would then determine whether or not the instructor was teaching the objectives being tested. In Model B, evaluation would be built into the course planning. The instructor would consult with the evaluation committee and explain the desired outcomes for students in his course. The committee would use the information obtained from the instructor to formulate tentative behavioral objectives for the course. After the course instruction has begun, the evaluation committee could use the instructor's student evaluation procedures to evaluate the instructor. The evaluation would then take the form of Model A in determining the degree of congruency between course objectives and student performance. (HS)

Notes

Educational level discussed: Higher Education.

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: https://eric.ed.gov/

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Evaluation Methods.  |  Higher Education.  |  Teacher Evaluation.  |  Teacher Improvement.
Other authors/contributors Dittenhafer, Clarence A., author
Available From ERIC 
000 02561cam a22003012u 4500
001 5239239
005 20181017113604.0
007 he u||024||||
008 080220s1972    xxu ||| b     ||| | eng d
035 |9(ericd)ED071569
037 |aED071569|bERIC
040 |aericd|beng|cericd|dMvI
091 |amfm
100 1 |aPascale, Pietro J.
245 1 0 |aApplication of an Instructional Evaluation for University College|h[microform] /|cPietro J. Pascale and Clarence A. Dittenhafer.
260 |a[Washington, D.C.] :|bDistributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,|c1972.
300 |a24 p.
500 |aEducational level discussed: Higher Education.
520 |aIn this document, two evaluations of college instruction models are proposed. Model A, a very objective summative evaluation is made utilizing behavioral objectives. The evaluating committee secures copies of the instructor's course examination. The evaluation committee will analyze the examination from the standpoint of instructional emphasis, i.e., content, critical thinking, etc. After the examination is given, the instructor will score the students' responses and assign grades. The instructor will pass the examination on to the evaluation committee where student responses will be analyzed in relation to the course objectives as inferred by the committee from examination of the test. The committee would then determine whether or not the instructor was teaching the objectives being tested. In Model B, evaluation would be built into the course planning. The instructor would consult with the evaluation committee and explain the desired outcomes for students in his course. The committee would use the information obtained from the instructor to formulate tentative behavioral objectives for the course. After the course instruction has begun, the evaluation committee could use the instructor's student evaluation procedures to evaluate the instructor. The evaluation would then take the form of Model A in determining the degree of congruency between course objectives and student performance. (HS)
530 |aMay also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: |uhttps://eric.ed.gov/
533 |aMicrofiche.|b[Washington D.C.]:|cERIC Clearinghouse|emicrofiches : positive.
650 1 7 |aEvaluation Methods.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aHigher Education.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aTeacher Evaluation.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aTeacher Improvement.|2ericd
700 1 |aDittenhafer, Clarence A.,|eauthor.
856 4 1 |uhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED071569
984 |aANL|cmc 2253 ED071569|d77000000075222
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.