National Library of Australia

You must be logged in to Tag Records
Minneapolis IPI Mathematics Project 1971-72 [microform] : Third Year Evaluation. A Title I, ESEA Project / Lary Johnson
Bib ID 5248885
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Johnson, Lary
Online Versions
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1972 
61 p. 

The evaluation of the third year of the Individually Prescribed Instruction (IPI) mathematics project at the Hall School in Minneapolis (grades 1-6) is discussed, and results for the three years are summarized. The process evaluation during the third year concentrated on three areas: group instructional methods, instructional materials other than the Standard Teaching Sequence booklets, and prescription practices. To determine whether the IPI project was successful in raising the median raw scores on overall mathematics achievement, the basic evaluation techniques used during the third year were a standardized achievement test, a semantic differential attitude scale, a locally developed arithmetic basic skills test, a record of student progress in the IPI continuum, and teacher interviews. Students in grades 4-6 in two other Title I elementary schools were used as a comparison population. The evaluation data are tabulated and discussed. Results of the study showed that Hall students continued to make progress during the third year. Students in grades 3 and 4, who had had most of their formal math instruction with IPI, had higher percentile ranks than students in grades 5 and 6. Process evaluation of instructional activities indicated differences between classrooms in use of group instruction, variety of instructional materials, and prescription practices. Reactions of the teachers emphasized the value of the individualized approach for student achievement and attitude. Fourth and fifth grade students at Hall had a more positive attitude toward math than did students at the two comparison schools. Appendixes provide Basic Operational Skills Test for Grades Four and Six and The Semantic Differential Scale Used with IPI in 1971-72. (DB)


ERIC Note: DIR-1.

Educational level discussed: Elementary Education.

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Academic Achievement.  |  Comparative Analysis.  |  Educational Testing.  |  Elementary Education.  |  Evaluation Methods.  |  Individualized Instruction.  |  Mathematics Instruction.  |  Program Evaluation.  |  Research Reports.  |  Student Attitudes.  |  Tables (Data)  |  Teacher Attitudes.  |  Minneapolis Public Schools MN
Other authors/contributors Minneapolis Public Schools, Minn. Dept. of Research and Evaluation
Available From ERIC 


In the Library

Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

Details Collect From
mc 2253 ED083290 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

Order a copy

- Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.