National Library of Australia

We’re delighted to be able to increase our reading room services and opening hours. Read more...

<< Previous record  /  Next record >>
Record 254 of 4372
You must be logged in to Tag Records
PERT Planning for Physical Educational Facilities [microform] / R. J. Moriarty
Bib ID 5261240
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Moriarty, R. J
Online Versions
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1973 
11 p. 

Because of the high degree of interest in education and physical education in Canada, there has been a phenomenal growth in physical education facilities. Physical educators must become facility specialists in order to contribute to the planning, procurement, and utilization of the new complexes that are being developed. Among the most difficult tasks in developing facilities are justification, recording of details of facilities visited, and the manipulation and orientation of areas in a projected facility. In order to alleviate these difficulties, the facility planning team at the University of Windsor developed three main items: (1) the Survey Check List, which provides a structured comprehensive approach for recording details of existing or projected facilities; (2) the template for outdoor athletic facilities, which provides a scaled guide to assist in recording playing areas, dimensions, and orientation; and (3) the transparent floor planning kit, which consists of transparent plastic sheets over graph paper and various colored, china, flexible pencils which can be used in conjunction with the template to develop the preliminary floor plans and to show the basic orientation from court or floor to floor in an evolving facility. In those situations where a major project is undertaken and the importance of getting the job done with the least expenditure of valuable human and physical resources is paramount, the Program Evaluation Review Technique (PERT) is an appropriate system. (Author/EA)


ERIC Note: A related document is EA 006 422.

CAHPER Journal, v37 n5 pp24-29 May-Jun 1971 and v39 n 6 pp33-37 Jul-Aug 1973.

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Architectural Drafting.  |  Architectural Programing.  |  Case Studies.  |  Critical Path Method.  |  Facility Guidelines.  |  Facility Planning.  |  Facility Requirements.  |  Faculty.  |  Models.  |  Physical Education Facilities.  |  Universities.  |  Program Evaluation and Review Technique  |  Canada
Form/genre Journal Articles.
Other authors/contributors Canadian Association for Health, Physical Education, and Recreation, Ottawa (Ontario)
Available From ERIC 


In the Library

Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

Details Collect From
mc 2253 ED096749 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

Order a copy

- Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.