02042cam a22003132u 4500001000800000005001700008007001400025008004100039035002000080037001900100040002700119091000800146100002400154245009200178260006800270300000900338500016700347520081200514530007901326533008101405650003101486650003301517650003101550650002001581650002501601653002401626655003601650984004201686530119220181019100257.0he u||024||||080220s1976 xxu ||| b ||| s eng d 9(ericd)ED120932 aED120932bERIC aericdbengcericddMvI amfm1 aTyser, Arlington G.10aGrading and Ranking Procedure in Beatrice, Nebraskah[microform] /cArlington G. Tyser. a[Washington, D.C.] :bDistributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,c1976. a8 p. aERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Secondary School Principals (60th, Washington, D.C., February 13-18, 1976).5ericd aBeatrice high school is faced with the need to provide class ranking for students at the same time that it has courses at three levels of difficulty for the normal student and at a fourth level for the educable mentally handicapped. In order to develop an equitable class-ranking system, an honor point system was adopted to relate grades in more difficult classes to grades in less difficult classes. This system allows the full range of grades to be given in classes at each difficulty level. In order to avoid basing class rank on grade point alone, the system also considers the number of classes a student takes. The result has been to encourage students concerned about high class-standing to take more courses, to take courses of high difficulty, and to earn the highest grades possible. (Author/IRT) aMay also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:uhttps://eric.ed.gov/ aMicrofiche.b[Washington D.C.]:cERIC Clearinghouseemicrofiches : positive.17aAchievement Rating.2ericd07aFlexible Progression.2ericd07aGrades (Scholastic)2ericd17aGrading.2ericd07aHigh Schools.2ericd0 aNebraska (Beatrice) 7aSpeeches/Meeting Papers.2ericd aANLcmc 2253 ED120932d77000000133132