National Library of Australia

Enjoy a CovidSafe visit to the National Library.

<< Previous record  /  Next record >>
Record 11 of 14
You must be logged in to Tag Records
Processes Operative During Delay of Gratification [microform] / J. Frank Yates and Glenda L. Revelle
Bib ID 5352472
Format MicroformMicroform, BookBook
Yates, J. Frank
Description [Washington, D.C.]] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1977 
27 p. 

This study focused on the processes occurring during the waiting period in delay of gratification situations. Sixty-four middle class preschool children chose between waiting for a preferred item and receiving a less desired item immediately. The items were of different classes, i. e., one food and one toy, and subjects waited with one, both, or neither of the rewards available for viewing. The pattern of subjects' delay times was incompatible with the predictions of two current theories of delay of gratification processes, an aversive affect model implied by Mischel and Ebbesen (1970) and Atkinson and Birch's dynamics of action (1970). Although display of rewards impaired successful delay, replicating previous results, dynamics of action predictions of differential effects for display of immediately available and delayed outcomes of different classes were not confirmed. Contradicting a prediction based on the aversive affect model, subjects' likelihoods of continued waiting did not decrease as a function of previous waiting time. Systematic observation of spontaneous subject activities during the delay period offered support for the notion that distraction facilitates successful waiting behavior. Overall, results were consistent with a proposed generalization of decision theoretical models of delay behavior which conceives of the waiting period as a series of decision-making opportunities in which successive reappraisals of the time vs value tradeoff are made. (Author/CM)


ERIC Note: Revision of paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development (New Orleans, Louisiana, March 17-20, 1977).

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Affective Behavior.  |  Behavior Theories.  |  Behavioral Science Research.  |  Cognitive Processes.  |  Decision Making.  |  Delay of Gratification.  |  Forced Choice Technique.  |  Models.  |  Observation.  |  Preschool Children.  |  Probability.  |  Psychological Studies.  |  Responses.  |  Rewards.  |  Situational Tests.
Form/genre Reports, Research.
Other authors/contributors Revelle, Glenda L., author
Available From ERIC 


    In the Library

    Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

    Details Collect From
    mc 2253 ED156311 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
    This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

    Order a copy

    - Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

    Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
    close Can I borrow items from the Library?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    close What can I get online?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
    Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.