National Library of Australia

You must be logged in to Tag Records
The Evaluation of Instruction [microform] / Kim Kanaga
Bib ID 5373691
Format MicroformMicroform, BookBook
Kanaga, Kim
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1978 
40 p. 

Some of the theoretical and methodological problems with current practices in evaluating instruction at the higher education level are reviewed. Controversy over the evaluation of instruction in higher education has resulted at least in part from inadequate instrumentation. The instruments for instructional rating now used include administrator evaluations, colleague evaluations, self-evaluations, and student evaluations. It is suggested that the teaching-learning relationship must be the focus of meaningful evaluations of instruction. A multidimensional scaling technique for precisely evaluating instruction that is based on a cognitive perspective of student learning is presented. The technique provides a means of assessing cognitive processes in a manner that has been found to be precise and reliable and enables the direct assessment of teaching effectiveness. A major advantage is that the proposed system does not require advance knowledge of all relevant criteria on which student responses are based, although specific attributes used for making distance judgments can be interpreted from the results. Making complete paired comparisons on all concepts that are provided allows multiple criteria to be simultaneously examined and reduces the influence of social desirability factors. This evaluation system also establishes explicit standards for direct evaluation; provides relevant information for administrators, instructors, and students; is precisely ratio-scaled; and permits powerful time-series analysis of the learning process, permitting instructors to monitor their effectiveness throughout the term. (SC)


ERIC Note: Not available in paper copy due to marginal legibility of original; Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference (Chicago, Illinois, April 25-29, 1978).

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects College Instruction.  |  Conference Reports.  |  Educational Assessment.  |  Evaluation Methods.  |  Faculty Evaluation.  |  Higher Education.  |  Instructional Improvement.  |  Multidimensional Scaling.  |  Peer Evaluation.  |  Self Evaluation.  |  Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance.  |  Teacher Effectiveness.
Form/genre Speeches/Meeting Papers.  |  Reports, Research.
Available From ERIC 


    In the Library

    Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

    Details Collect From
    mc 2253 ED177936 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
    This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

    Order a copy

    - Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

    Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
    close Can I borrow items from the Library?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    close What can I get online?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
    Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.