National Library of Australia

Due to the need to contain the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) the Library building and reading rooms are closed to visitors until further notice.
The health and safety of our community is of great importance to us and we look forward to staying connected with you online.

<< Previous record  /  Next record >>
Record 42 of 652
You must be logged in to Tag Records
Language Status Decisions and the Law in the United States [microform] / Shirley Brice Heath and Frederick Mandabach
Bib ID 5401437
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Heath, Shirley Brice
Online Versions
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1978 
34 p. 

The status of pluralistic languages in the United States may be traced back to attitudes and policies developed in medieval England, where Norman French, Old English, and Latin were each associated with certain contexts and certain populations. English finally achieved dominant status in all domains, but this achievement came about through cultural and societal, rather than legal, forces. In the United States as well, the status of English was achieved without official declaration. The early history of the United States contains few instances of attempts to restrict the use of other languages (with the exception of the American Indian languages). In fact, up to the end of the Civil War, the United States could well have been called a multilingual society. Toward the end of the 19th century and into the early 20th, many state laws were passed restricting the use of languages other than English, especially in education. Two reasons for this shift were the growing tendency to regard the public school as an institution to create a unified conforming citizenry, and the emergence of "subversive speech" as a crime commonly before the courts. In current discussions over the creation of a national language policy, policy makers should be guided less by a past of restrictive legislation than by a sense of the history behind that legislation. (JB)


Sponsoring Agency: National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC.

Contract Number: NIE-G-78-0192.

ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Conference "Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives" (Wayne, NJ, April 29-May 1, 1979).

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Cultural Pluralism.  |  Discriminatory Legislation.  |  Language Maintenance.  |  Minority Groups.  |  North American History.  |  Public Policy.  |  Sociolinguistics.
Form/genre Information Analyses.  |  Speeches/Meeting Papers.
Other authors/contributors Mandabach, Frederick, author
Available From ERIC 


In the Library

Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

Details Collect From
mc 2253 ED205007 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

Order a copy

- Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.