National Library of Australia

You must be logged in to Tag Records
Evaluating Teaching [microform] / Kenneth O. Doyle, Jr
Bib ID 5433304
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Author
Doyle, Kenneth O., Jr
 
Online Versions
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1983 
4 p. 
Summary

One philosophical issue underlying instructional evaluation arises from tension between the concepts of academic freedom and academic responsibility. Academic freedom can be cited as an argument against evaluating teaching in circumstances where evaluation genuinely encumbers the pursuit or dissemination of knowledge. Another source of tension centers around the notion that instructor's credentials, position, and expertise preclude evaluation. Some feel that until we know more about evaluation, we should do nothing. Others feel that failure to evaluate may lead to sins more grievous than would evaluation with uncertainty. In the face of increasing demands placed upon faculty to furnish more and more evidence supporting the amount, quality, and value of what they do, many faculty members want to do away with intrusive evaluation policies, while students and administrators push for objective data to facilitate decisions and guarantee educational quality. A major psychometric issue in instructional evaluation is whether evaluation should focus on instructional outcomes or on instructional processes. The problems of evaluating teaching by measuring student learning are both philosophical and methodological. On the other hand, evaluating teaching by measuring course and instructor characteristics and behavior that are indicative of good teaching is no less complex. A reasonable goal would be to devise an evaluation plan that takes advantage of the strengths of process measures, but that also guards against their weaknesses. (LH)

Notes

ERIC Note: Excerpted from "Evaluating Teaching," Heath and Company.

Educational level discussed: Postsecondary Education.

Administrators.

Teachers.

Practitioners.

Innovation Abstracts, v5 n27 Sep 30 1983.

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: https://eric.ed.gov/

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Academic Freedom.  |  Accountability.  |  Beliefs.  |  College Instruction.  |  College Students.  |  Evaluation Criteria.  |  Faculty College Relationship.  |  Instructional Improvement.  |  Postsecondary Education.  |  Student College Relationship.  |  Teacher Evaluation.  |  Evaluation Problems  |  Evaluation Utilization PF Project
Form/genre Collected Works, Serials.  |  Opinion Papers.  |  Guides, Non-Classroom.
Available From ERIC 

Online

In the Library

Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

Details Collect From
mc 2253 ED237174 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

Order a copy

- Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.