03559cam a22005172u 4500001000800000005001700008007001400025008004100039035002000080037001900100040002700119091000800146110006200154245010200216260007100318300000900389500015100398500009900549500004100648500004700689520143000736521002602166530008002192533008102272650002402353650003502377650003602412650003102448650002902479650002902508650002102537650003102558650003502589650003102624650003102655650002502686650002702711650003102738650003102769653003402800655003002834655004802864710005002912856003702962984004202999547232020181012145326.0he u||024||||080220s1986 xxu ||| b ||| | eng d 9(ericd)ED275053 aED275053bERIC aericdbengcericddMvI amfm2 aERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, Eugene, OR.10aIdentifying At-Risk Students. The Best of ERIC on Educational Management, Number 85h[microform]. aEugene, OR :bERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management,c1986. a5 p. aAvailability: Publications, ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon, 1787 Agate Street, Eugene, OR 97403 (free).5ericd aSponsoring Agency: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC.5ericd aContract Number: 400-86-0003.5ericd aEducational level discussed: High Schools. aPresented in this annotated bibliography of 12 publications on students at risk are descriptions of (1) a study of 100 Austin, Texas, dropouts that identifies characteristics and conditions of high-risk students; (2) a study recommending a variety of programs to improve the progression of high-risk high school and college students; (3) a manual for recognizing potential dropouts and constructing a prevention program; (4) a pilot study in helping students correct impulsive behavior linked to delinquency; (5) findings from a national study of 30,000 high schol sophomores identifying high-risk characteristics and causal relatonships leading to dropping out; (6) a report from Kentucky that defines 32 variables for identifying high-risk high school students; (7) a manual of a Sacramento, California, high-risk behavior prevention program; (8) an analysis of educational policies arguing that many programs designed to help high-risk students lead to inequity in public education; (9) a report on characteristics of successful retention programs; (10) a report from Oregon of a two-year first-grade program aimed at preventing later grade failures; (11) a report recommending reforms in school policies as a means of preventing dropout; and (12) a research agenda of studies to be conducted by the National Center on Effective Secondary Schools on implementation strategies that are effective with at-risk students. (IW)8 aPractitioners.bericd aMay also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: uhttps://eric.ed.gov/ aMicrofiche.b[Washington D.C.]:cERIC Clearinghouseemicrofiches : positive.07aDelinquency.2ericd07aDelinquency Prevention.2ericd07aDropout Characteristics.2ericd17aDropout Prevention.2ericd17aDropout Programs.2ericd17aDropout Research.2ericd07aDropouts.2ericd07aEducational Change.2ericd07aEducational Innovation.2ericd07aEducational Policy.2ericd17aHigh Risk Students.2ericd07aHigh Schools.2ericd07aIdentification.2ericd07aLiterature Reviews.2ericd07aPotential Dropouts.2ericd0 aHigh School and Beyond (NCES) 7aERIC Publications.2ericd 7aReference Materials, Bibliographies.2ericd2 aERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.41uhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED275053 aANLcmc 2253 ED275053d77000000280389