The Pornography Controversy [microform] : Issues, Effects Research, and First Amendment Rights / Victoria O'Donnell
- Bib ID:
- 5476249
- Format:
- Book and Microform
- Author:
- O'Donnell, Victoria
- Description:
-
- [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1986
- 25 p.
- Summary:
-
Advances in media technology, specifically the videotape industry, have made pornography widely available. Opponents of pornography include religious groups, law enforcement officers, some politicians, and some feminists. A distinction is made between eroticism (occurring between consenting participants) and pornography (signifying overt or covert coercion). Research on the effects of eroticism and pornography reveals that (1) observed erotic behavior may elicit sexual reactions but does not heighten aggression; (2) observed sexual aggression may evoke aggression-facilitating responses; (3) when erotica and pornography both have unpleasant or extravagant content, they are equal in their effect on the aggression levels of viewers; (4) the effects of modeled sexual assaults are strongly influenced by how the victims' reactions are portrayed; (5) massive exposure to pornography alters sexual standards and attitudes toward women, but decreases aggression; and (6) individual predispositions are a major factor in determining the effects of pornography on individuals. The First Amendment protects free speech regardless of content, yet in the 1973 "Miller vs. California" the Supreme Court decision ruled that a work is obscene based on the standard of whether the average person would find that the material appeals to prurient interest. The Miller standard has assisted local communities in applying enforcement of morality among its citizens. In 1986, the Meese Commission on Obscenity and Pornography claimed that pornography is not speech and therefore does not fall under constitutional protection. If pornography is interpreted as real action rather than expressive speech and if causality between pornography and sex crimes can be proven, pornography could be denied constitutional protection. (Fifty-two references are listed.) (SRT)
- Notes:
-
- ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association (72nd, Chicago, IL, November 13-16, 1986).
- May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: https://eric.ed.gov/
- Reproduction:
- Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive.
- Subject:
- Available From:
- ERIC
- Copyright:
-
In Copyright
You may copy under some circumstances, for example you may copy a portion for research or study. Order a copy through Copies Direct to the extent allowed under fair dealing. Contact us for further information about copying.
Copyright status was determined using the following information:
- Material type:
- Literary Dramatic Musical
- Published status:
- Published
- Publication date:
- 1986
Copyright status may not be correct if data in the record is incomplete or inaccurate. Other access conditions may also apply. For more information please see: Copyright in library collections.
Request this item
Request this item to view in the Library’s reading room.
Feedback
Similar items
- Pornography and obscenity / by D.H. Lawrence
- Ma vie secrète
- The jaguar and the anteater : pornography degree zero / Bernard Arcand ; translated by Wayne Grady
- Manuel pratique pour la lutte contre la pornographie. [microform]
- The National Council of Civil Liberties (NCCL) invites you to a public debate : pornography & liberty