National Library of Australia

You must be logged in to Tag Records
A Comparison of Computer-Based Bibliographic Database Searching vs. Manual Bibliographic Searching. Final CARE Grant Report #5964 [microform] / Eileen E. Pritchard and Ilene F. Rockman
Bib ID 5507768
Format MicroformMicroform, BookBook
Author
Pritchard, Eileen E
 
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1986 
9 p. 
Summary

The purpose of this study was to improve upon previous research investigations by analyzing the elements of cost effectiveness, precision, recall, citation overlap, and hours searching in a comparison between computerized database searching and manual searching, using the setting of an academic library environment with a diverse group of students as subjects. Students enrolled in Library 301 (computer searching) during four academic quarters in 1985 and 1986 at two California colleges provided the laboratory sample for the data collection (N=64). The students were introduced to three weeks of instruction on the concepts of manual search searching and three weeks on automated search techniques and strategies. The remaining four weeks were spent applying the knowledge to a research project that required using both types of search skills. The results indicated that: (1) contrary to previous studies, in most cases online searching was not a cost-effective method for retrieving data; (2) higher recall occurred online, while higher precision occurred through manual searching; (3) the citation overlap between the two sources was 2.9%; and (4) more time was spent searching manually than online. Areas identified for further research include the relationship between satisfaction and precision (high satisfaction is not synonymous with high precision); the influence of multiple instrumental strategies on search output; and the relationship between the number of relevant items found and the time expended. Data are compiled in seven tables and a 16-item bibliography is provided. (SD)

Notes

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: https://eric.ed.gov/

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Academic Libraries.  |  Bibliographic Databases.  |  Comparative Analysis.  |  Cost Effectiveness.  |  Indexes.  |  Information Retrieval.  |  Online Systems.  |  Search Strategies.  |  User Needs (Information)  |  User Satisfaction (Information)
Form/genre Reports, Research.
Other authors/contributors Rockman, Ilene F., author
Available From ERIC 
000 02996cam a22003612u 4500
001 5507768
005 20181022110434.0
007 he u||024||||
008 080220s1986    xxu ||| bt    ||| | eng d
035 |9(ericd)ED310789
037 |aED310789|bERIC
040 |aericd|beng|cericd|dMvI
091 |amfm
100 1 |aPritchard, Eileen E.
245 1 2 |aA Comparison of Computer-Based Bibliographic Database Searching vs. Manual Bibliographic Searching. Final CARE Grant Report #5964|h[microform] /|cEileen E. Pritchard and Ilene F. Rockman.
260 |a[Washington, D.C.] :|bDistributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,|c1986.
300 |a9 p.
520 |aThe purpose of this study was to improve upon previous research investigations by analyzing the elements of cost effectiveness, precision, recall, citation overlap, and hours searching in a comparison between computerized database searching and manual searching, using the setting of an academic library environment with a diverse group of students as subjects. Students enrolled in Library 301 (computer searching) during four academic quarters in 1985 and 1986 at two California colleges provided the laboratory sample for the data collection (N=64). The students were introduced to three weeks of instruction on the concepts of manual search searching and three weeks on automated search techniques and strategies. The remaining four weeks were spent applying the knowledge to a research project that required using both types of search skills. The results indicated that: (1) contrary to previous studies, in most cases online searching was not a cost-effective method for retrieving data; (2) higher recall occurred online, while higher precision occurred through manual searching; (3) the citation overlap between the two sources was 2.9%; and (4) more time was spent searching manually than online. Areas identified for further research include the relationship between satisfaction and precision (high satisfaction is not synonymous with high precision); the influence of multiple instrumental strategies on search output; and the relationship between the number of relevant items found and the time expended. Data are compiled in seven tables and a 16-item bibliography is provided. (SD)
530 |aMay also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:|uhttps://eric.ed.gov/
533 |aMicrofiche.|b[Washington D.C.]:|cERIC Clearinghouse|emicrofiches : positive.
650 0 7 |aAcademic Libraries.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aBibliographic Databases.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aComparative Analysis.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aCost Effectiveness.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aIndexes.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aInformation Retrieval.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aOnline Systems.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aSearch Strategies.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aUser Needs (Information)|2ericd
650 1 7 |aUser Satisfaction (Information)|2ericd
655 7 |aReports, Research.|2ericd
700 1 |aRockman, Ilene F.,|eauthor.
984 |aANL|cmc 2253 ED310789|d77000000314879
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.