National Library of Australia

Record 1 of 1
You must be logged in to Tag Records
A Comparison of Computer-Based Bibliographic Database Searching vs. Manual Bibliographic Searching. Final CARE Grant Report #5964 [microform] / Eileen E. Pritchard and Ilene F. Rockman
Bib ID 5507768
Format MicroformMicroform, BookBook
Author
Pritchard, Eileen E
 
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1986 
9 p. 
Summary

The purpose of this study was to improve upon previous research investigations by analyzing the elements of cost effectiveness, precision, recall, citation overlap, and hours searching in a comparison between computerized database searching and manual searching, using the setting of an academic library environment with a diverse group of students as subjects. Students enrolled in Library 301 (computer searching) during four academic quarters in 1985 and 1986 at two California colleges provided the laboratory sample for the data collection (N=64). The students were introduced to three weeks of instruction on the concepts of manual search searching and three weeks on automated search techniques and strategies. The remaining four weeks were spent applying the knowledge to a research project that required using both types of search skills. The results indicated that: (1) contrary to previous studies, in most cases online searching was not a cost-effective method for retrieving data; (2) higher recall occurred online, while higher precision occurred through manual searching; (3) the citation overlap between the two sources was 2.9%; and (4) more time was spent searching manually than online. Areas identified for further research include the relationship between satisfaction and precision (high satisfaction is not synonymous with high precision); the influence of multiple instrumental strategies on search output; and the relationship between the number of relevant items found and the time expended. Data are compiled in seven tables and a 16-item bibliography is provided. (SD)

Notes

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: https://eric.ed.gov/

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Academic Libraries.  |  Bibliographic Databases.  |  Comparative Analysis.  |  Cost Effectiveness.  |  Indexes.  |  Information Retrieval.  |  Online Systems.  |  Search Strategies.  |  User Needs (Information)  |  User Satisfaction (Information)
Form/genre Reports, Research.
Other authors/contributors Rockman, Ilene F., author
Available From ERIC 

Online

    In the Library

    Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

    Details Collect From
    mc 2253 ED310789 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
    This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

    Order a copy

    - Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

    Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
    close Can I borrow items from the Library?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    close What can I get online?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

    You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

    You can view this on the NLA website.

    Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
    Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.