National Library of Australia

Enjoy a CovidSafe visit to the National Library. Read more...

<< Previous record  /  Next record >>
Record 15 of 354
You must be logged in to Tag Records
National Dissemination Forum on Issues Relating to Special Education Teacher Satisfaction, Retention and Attrition (Washington, District of Columbia, May 25-26, 1995) [microform]
Bib ID 5588592
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Author
Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC
 
Online Versions
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1995 
265 p. 
Summary

This document contains 13 papers presented at a national forum on special education teacher satisfaction, retention, and attrition. The forum focused on results and implications of three studies: (1) the San Diego State University/American Institute for Research (California) study of variables related to the satisfaction, attrition, and retention of special education teachers; (2) the Research Triangle Institute (Tennessee) study on improving the retention of special education teachers; and (3) the Eugene Research Institute (Oregon) study on attrition/retention of urban special education teachers. A paper titled "Overview of the Three Research Projects" (by Patricia Thomas Cegelka) introduces the collection and is followed by "The National Picture: Messages from SASS (Schools and Staffing Survey) Data" (Erling E. Boe et al.). Other papers include: "The Attrition Picture: Lessons from Three Research Projects" (John Pyecha and Roger Levine); "Working Conditions: Job Design" (Russell Gersten et al.); "Working Conditions: Administrator Support" (Bonnie Billingsley et al.); "Impact of Job Design Problems and Lack of Support" (Russell Gersten et al.); "Personnel Preparation: Relationship to Job Satisfaction" (Patricia Cegelka and Donald Doorlag); "Strategic Planning for Special Education Teacher Retention" (Peggie Campeau and John Pyecha); "Attrition/Retention of Urban Special Education Teachers: Multi-Faceted Research and Strategic Action Planning" (Martha Morvant and Russell Gersten); "Teachers' Perceptions of Working Conditions: Problems Relating to Central Office Support [and] Section 2: Administrative Support" (Russell Gersten et al.); "Attrition of Special Educators: Why They Leave and Where They Go" (Mary T. Brownell et al.); "Retention and Attrition in Special Education: Analysis of Variables That Predict Staying, Transferring, or Leaving" (David Miller et al.); and "Retention, Transfer, and Attrition of Special and General Education Teachers in National Perspective" (Erling E. Boe et al.) (DB)

Notes

Sponsoring Agency: Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC.

ERIC Note: For selected individual papers, see EC 304 435-445.

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: https://eric.ed.gov/

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Decision Making.  |  Disabilities.  |  Elementary Secondary Education.  |  Faculty Mobility.  |  Job Satisfaction.  |  Labor Turnover.  |  Research Projects.  |  Special Education Teachers.  |  Strategic Planning.  |  Teacher Administrator Relationship.  |  Teacher Attitudes.  |  Teacher Burnout.  |  Teacher Employment.  |  Teacher Morale.  |  Teacher Persistence.  |  Teaching (Occupation)  |  Urban Education.
Form/genre Collected Works, Proceedings.  |  Reports, Research.
Other authors/contributors Academy for Educational Development, Washington, DC
Available From ERIC 
000 04068cam a22004932u 4500
001 5588592
005 20181019152457.0
007 he u||024||||
008 080220s1995    xxu ||| b     ||| | eng d
035 |9(ericd)ED389147
037 |aED389147|bERIC
040 |aericd|beng|cericd|dMvI
091 |amfm
110 2 |aAcademy for Educational Development, Washington, DC.
245 1 0 |aNational Dissemination Forum on Issues Relating to Special Education Teacher Satisfaction, Retention and Attrition (Washington, District of Columbia, May 25-26, 1995)|h[microform].
260 |a[Washington, D.C.] :|bDistributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,|c1995.
300 |a265 p.
500 |aSponsoring Agency: Special Education Programs (ED/OSERS), Washington, DC.|5ericd
500 |aERIC Note: For selected individual papers, see EC 304 435-445.|5ericd
520 |aThis document contains 13 papers presented at a national forum on special education teacher satisfaction, retention, and attrition. The forum focused on results and implications of three studies: (1) the San Diego State University/American Institute for Research (California) study of variables related to the satisfaction, attrition, and retention of special education teachers; (2) the Research Triangle Institute (Tennessee) study on improving the retention of special education teachers; and (3) the Eugene Research Institute (Oregon) study on attrition/retention of urban special education teachers. A paper titled "Overview of the Three Research Projects" (by Patricia Thomas Cegelka) introduces the collection and is followed by "The National Picture: Messages from SASS (Schools and Staffing Survey) Data" (Erling E. Boe et al.). Other papers include: "The Attrition Picture: Lessons from Three Research Projects" (John Pyecha and Roger Levine); "Working Conditions: Job Design" (Russell Gersten et al.); "Working Conditions: Administrator Support" (Bonnie Billingsley et al.); "Impact of Job Design Problems and Lack of Support" (Russell Gersten et al.); "Personnel Preparation: Relationship to Job Satisfaction" (Patricia Cegelka and Donald Doorlag); "Strategic Planning for Special Education Teacher Retention" (Peggie Campeau and John Pyecha); "Attrition/Retention of Urban Special Education Teachers: Multi-Faceted Research and Strategic Action Planning" (Martha Morvant and Russell Gersten); "Teachers' Perceptions of Working Conditions: Problems Relating to Central Office Support [and] Section 2: Administrative Support" (Russell Gersten et al.); "Attrition of Special Educators: Why They Leave and Where They Go" (Mary T. Brownell et al.); "Retention and Attrition in Special Education: Analysis of Variables That Predict Staying, Transferring, or Leaving" (David Miller et al.); and "Retention, Transfer, and Attrition of Special and General Education Teachers in National Perspective" (Erling E. Boe et al.) (DB)
530 |aMay also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:|uhttps://eric.ed.gov/
533 |aMicrofiche.|b[Washington D.C.]:|cERIC Clearinghouse|emicrofiches : positive.
650 0 7 |aDecision Making.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aDisabilities.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aElementary Secondary Education.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aFaculty Mobility.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aJob Satisfaction.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aLabor Turnover.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aResearch Projects.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aSpecial Education Teachers.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aStrategic Planning.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aTeacher Administrator Relationship.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aTeacher Attitudes.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aTeacher Burnout.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aTeacher Employment.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aTeacher Morale.|2ericd
650 1 7 |aTeacher Persistence.|2ericd
650 0 7 |aTeaching (Occupation)|2ericd
650 0 7 |aUrban Education.|2ericd
655 7 |aCollected Works, Proceedings.|2ericd
655 7 |aReports, Research.|2ericd
710 2 |aAcademy for Educational Development, Washington, DC.
856 4 1 |uhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED389147
984 |aANL|cmc 2253 ED389147|d77000000394085
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.