03398cam a22004812u 4500001000800000005001700008007001400025008004100039035002000080035001200100037001900112040002700131091000800158100002200166245015500188260005600343300001000399500013200409520148700541530007902028533008102107650003602188650003102224650003902255650002002294650003102314650004002345650002902385650003002414650003302444650003402477650003502511650003202546650002902578650004102607650002902648650003002677653004502707655003202752710005302784856003702837984004202874560414520181019101305.0he u||024||||080220s1996 xxu ||| bt ||| | eng d 9(ericd)ED405573 a5604145 aED405573bERIC aericdbengcericddMvI amfm1 aSchotanus, Helen.10aReading Recovery Program Implementation Year Six, School Year 1995-96. Report of Results and Effectivenessh[microform] /cHelen Schotanus and Others. a[S.l.] :bDistributed by ERIC Clearinghouse,c1996. a39 p. aERIC Note: For earlier reports, see ED 364 869 and ED 363 859-860. For other reports in this series, see CS 012 763-764.5ericd aA study examined the results and effectiveness of the sixth year of the Reading Recovery program in New Hampshire. With the 95 Reading Recovery teachers from previous classes, 38 teachers in the new class, and 4 teacher leaders, a total of 137 teachers taught Reading Recovery during the 1995-96 school year. A total of 693 first-grade children identified as being at risk of reading failure were served. Results indicated that: (1) 549 (79%) successfully completed the program and were making at least average progress with regular classroom reading instruction; (2) both discontinued and program children attained scores on writing vocabulary, dictation, and text reading level measures which were within an average band; (3) children who were discontinued prior to April 1 continued to make successful progress on all three measures; and (4) the overall response from Reading Recovery teachers, classroom teachers, administrators, and parents on individual surveys was very positive and supportive. Recommendations include development of school building literacy teams to conduct studies to determine the factors that contribute to literacy success for all primary school children; and recognition of Reading Recovery as a supplemental service to classroom reading instruction. (Contains seven tables and nine figures of data. A list of Reading Recovery teachers and schools for the 1995-96 year and a list of the Reading Recovery Teachers-in-Training 1996-97 are attached.) (RS) aMay also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:uhttps://eric.ed.gov/ aMicrofiche.b[Washington D.C.]:cERIC Clearinghouseemicrofiches : positive.07aAdministrator Attitudes.2ericd07aEarly Intervention.2ericd07aElementary School Students.2ericd07aGrade 1.2ericd17aHigh Risk Students.2ericd17aInstructional Effectiveness.2ericd07aParent Attitudes.2ericd07aPrimary Education.2ericd07aProgram Descriptions.2ericd07aProgram Effectiveness.2ericd07aProgram Implementation.2ericd07aReading Improvement.2ericd07aReading Research.2ericd07aReading Writing Relationship.2ericd17aRemedial Reading.2ericd07aTeacher Attitudes.2ericd1 aNew HampshireaReading Recovery Projects 7aReports, Evaluative.2ericd2 aNew Hampshire State Dept. of Education, Concord.41uhttps://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED405573 aANLcmc 2253 ED405573d77000000408689