National Library of Australia

You must be logged in to Tag Records
Higher Education Trends (1997-1999) [microform] : Program Evaluation. ERIC-HE Trends / Adrianna J. Kezar
Bib ID 5631825
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Author
Kezar, Adrianna J
 
Online Versions
Description Washington, DC : ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, 1999 
5 p. 
Summary

The amount of literature on program evaluation decreased in 1996, continuing a trend begun in the late 1980s. One exception to this is the literature on assessment. Another frequent issue is the technique of evaluation. Many examples of research on evaluation are from international settings, where accountability and evaluation appear to be integrated into institutional systems. Student learning and satisfaction with services tend to be the focus of evaluation and assessment. An exception to the trend away from systemic evaluation is a paper by Aquirre and Hawkins, "Why Reinvent the Wheel? Let's Adapt Our Institutional Assessment Model," which describes an integrated assessment and strategic planning process designed to comply with accountability requirements at a community college in New Mexico. Most evaluation studies occur as students leave school or after they have graduated, and it would be helpful to have more evaluations while students were still in school. Some articles suggest ways to improve the process of evaluation. One area where research on evaluation is prevalent is research on new or nontraditional academic experiences, such as first-year seminars or bridge programs, experiential learning, and distance education. Some evaluation focuses specifically on faculty members, exploring the quality of teaching and research. Research on staff members' impact on student learning or experience is minimal. (Contains 12 references.) (JM)

Notes

Availability: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, One Dupont Circle, N.W., Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036-1183. Tel: 800-773-3742 (Toll-Free); Fax: 202-452-1844; Web site: <http://www.eriche.org>. For full text: <http://www.eriche.org/library/pgmeval.html>.

Sponsoring Agency: Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC.

Contract Number: ED99000036.

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18: https://eric.ed.gov/

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Accountability.  |  Course Evaluation.  |  Educational Assessment.  |  Educational Research.  |  Evaluation Criteria.  |  Evaluation Methods.  |  Evaluation Utilization.  |  Higher Education.  |  Institutional Evaluation.  |  Literature Reviews.  |  Program Evaluation.  |  Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance.
Form/genre Information Analyses.  |  ERIC Publications.
Other authors/contributors ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education  |  George Washington Univ., Washington, DC. Graduate School of Education and Human Development
Available From ERIC 

Be the first to leave a comment!

This space is for comments to help us enhance our existing data for collection items. Comments are only reviewed by staff on a monthly basis. All enquiries should be sent via the Feedback or the Ask a Librarian links located at the top right hand side of this page.

Add your comment (you will be asked to log in)
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.