National Library of Australia

We’re delighted to be able to increase our reading room services and opening hours. Read more...

You must be logged in to Tag Records
A Quantitative Investigation of Stakeholder Variation in Training Program Evaluation [microform] / Greg V. Michalski
Bib ID 5664862
Format BookBook, MicroformMicroform, OnlineOnline
Michalski, Greg V
Online Versions
Description [Washington, D.C.] : Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse, 1999 
46 p. 

A survey was conducted to investigate variation in stakeholder perceptions of training results and evaluation within the context of a high-technology product development firm (the case organization). A scannable questionnaire survey booklet was developed and scanned data were exported and analyzed. Based on an achieved sample of 280 (70% response rate), analyses involved the computation of descriptive statistics as well as the construction of several scale variables corresponding to perceived training program outcomes, evaluation processes, and uses. Reliability was examined, and program participant and line management stakeholder groups were compared. Other analyses examined the relationships between perceived training outcomes and preferences for evaluation processes and uses by group. Three predictor variables (customer satisfaction, product development, and employee satisfaction) were constructed using the conceptual framework from a previous investigation. The criterion variables were labeled as evaluation purposes, process, and consequences. Stepwise multiple regression revealed highly significant relationships between predictors (training results) involving employees and customer satisfaction and the criterion variables (training evaluation). The overall results suggest that both managers and nonmanagers tended to view the results and evaluation of training as being closely connected with employee satisfaction. An expanded deployment of the survey is recommended beyond the case organization for future research. Four appendixes contain the survey cover letter, the instrument, response demographics, factor analysis results, and the code and index structure for survey written comments. (Contains 19 references.) (Author/SLD)


ERIC Note: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association (Orlando, FL, November 3-6, 1999). Part of a larger study completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. in Education at the University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

May also be available online. Address as at 14/8/18:

Reproduction Microfiche. [Washington D.C.]: ERIC Clearinghouse microfiches : positive. 
Subjects Administrator Attitudes.  |  Employees.  |  Evaluation Methods.  |  Program Evaluation.  |  Science Programs.  |  Stakeholders.  |  Training.
Form/genre Speeches/Meeting Papers.
Available From ERIC 


In the Library

Request this item to view in the Library's reading rooms using your library card. To learn more about how to request items watch this short online video Help Video.

Details Collect From
mc 2253 ED435748 Main Reading Room - Newspapers and Family History
This item may be online. Please search the ERIC website prior to requesting this microfiche item.

Order a copy

- Copyright or permission restrictions may apply. We will contact you if necessary.

Help Video To learn more about Copies Direct watch this short online video Help Video.
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.