Children, parents and the courts : legal Intervention in family life / John Seymour
- Bib ID:
- 7085159
- Format:
- Book
- Author:
- Seymour, John A, author
- Description:
-
- Annandale, NSW : The Federation Press, 2016
- xvi, 187 pages ; 21 cm
- ISBN:
- 9781760020712 (paperback)
- Summary:
-
The family can be viewed as a private world, one into which courts should be reluctant to intrude. In our society, recognition of the specialness of the parent/child relationship is well entrenched: "The best person to bring up a child is the natural parent." Yet legal intervention in this relationship may be justified when children need protection. The resulting tension is the principal subject of this book. An Australian court dealing with a child must seek the outcome most likely to promote that child's "best interests". The book includes case studies illustrating the difficulties magistrates and judges have encountered in applying the best interests test. These cases also prompt questions about the capacity of courts to make effective orders when children are not receiving adequate care: a court order cannot re-make a child's life. The first part of the book looks at the various issues that may arise in regards to different views on what "best interests" may be. Cultural diversity must also be taken into account. To what extent should Australian law seek to accommodate differing views on child-rearing? This question is particularly relevant to an examination of the impact on Indigenous communities of current child protection policies. Cultural bias can be criticised, but the system should not lose sight of the goals and standards expected of procedures designed to achieve what is best for all children, Indigenous and non-Indigenous. In addition to considering cases in which parents' authority is challenged, Part II of the book addresses another issue. When a dispute arises about the medical treatment of a mature child, the child may assert the power to give the necessary consent to, or to decline, the treatment. If the adult world disapproves of the child's decision a court can override it on the ground that the child is vulnerable and needs protection. Is this a benevolent application of the "best interests" test or unwarranted paternalism?
- Notes:
- Includes bibliographical references (pages 181-184) and index.
- Subject:
-
- Children -- Legal status, laws, etc
- Children's rights -- Australia
- Parent and child (Law) -- Australia
- Conflict of laws -- Parent and child -- Australia
- Social identity - Aboriginality
- Law - Family law
- Social welfare - Law and legislation
- Race relations - Racial discrimination - Youth and children
- Family - Parents
- Children - Care and nurturing
- Law - Legal system - Courts - Court interpreters
- Child welfare - Child protection
- New South Wales (NSW)
- Australian
- Copyright:
-
In Copyright
You may copy under some circumstances, for example you may copy a portion for research or study. Order a copy through Copies Direct to the extent allowed under fair dealing. Contact us for further information about copying.
Copyright status was determined using the following information:
- Material type:
- Literary Dramatic Musical
- Published status:
- Published
- Publication date:
- 2016
Copyright status may not be correct if data in the record is incomplete or inaccurate. Other access conditions may also apply. For more information please see: Copyright in library collections.
Request this item
Request this item to view in the Library’s reading room.
Feedback
Similar items
- Before the best interests of the child / Joseph Goldstein, Anna Freud, Albert J. Solnit
- Parents and children / edited by Andrew Bainham
- A matter of priority : children and the legal process / Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Australian Law Reform Commission
- Children of the state : stolen for profit / Peter Van De Voorde
- Children of the state : stolen for profit / Peter Van de Voorde