National Library of Australia

<< Previous record  /  Next record >>
Record 14 of 43299
You must be logged in to Tag Records
Competing "Host" Discourses: Appropriation of Australian Aboriginal Culture in the Tourism Borderzones / Mroczek, Kristine R
Bib ID 7386951
Format MicroformMicroform, BookBook [text, microfiche]
Author
Mroczek, Kristine R., author
 
Description Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2016 
290 p. 
ISBN 9781369171785
Summary

As one of the largest global industries (WTTC, 2012), tourism is a powerful force in shaping intercultural knowledge (Bunten, 2010; Causey, 2003; Diamond, 2011). Through marketing and globally projected websites, government tourism authorities are often the dominant voice influencing outsiders' perceptions of the people and cultures of a tourism destination. These are particularly powerful narratives when the government uses indigenous peoples as a means to differentiate the nation from other tourism locations. These representations can perpetuate stereotypes of Aboriginal people for outsiders, while simultaneously influencing how those living within the tourism destination see themselves and their place in society (cf., Adams, 2006; Little, 2004). This project examines the Australian tourism industry and how Aboriginal art and culture are used to mediate national (and Aboriginal) identity.

In a place that has incorporated Aboriginal fine art into their national identity, it is a particularly intriguing place to examine how Aboriginal art is upheld as part of the national culture, when in many ways Aboriginal people have been removed from the equation. I interrogate the centers of power by comparing the dominant tourism industry's representations of Aboriginal art and culture, to the narratives and semiotic productions of Australian tourism intermediaries on the ground. I am interested in those less studied but equally important moments where local tourism "hosts" not working for the government tourism authority produce their own representations for tourism. I use critical discourse analysis and semiotic approaches to analyze Tourism Australia and their affiliates' websites, my field notes taken during participant observations and interviews, transcribed recorded interviews, and tourism arts labeling.

I approach this project with a critical intercultural communication lens, where culture is not just a neutral concept, nor is it essentialized as part of the nation, but it is "always and already implicated in power relations where differently positioned subjects and social entities (e.g., the nationstate) compete for advantage and control of the process of meaning production" (Halualani, Drzewiecka, & Mendoza, 2003 in Halualani & Nakayama, 2011). I argue that there are competing "host" discourses that are constructing---as well as de- and co-constructing---Aboriginal culture for the Australian tourism industry. The various hosts' stakes are foregrounded through these (re)presentations constructed for the tourism industry. In addition, I demonstrate how hosts communicating from the "bottom up" are powerful participants in producing self-representations through Aboriginal culture that resist the dominant tourism authority's narratives.

Notes

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: A.

Advisors: LeiLani Nishime Committee members: Ralina Joseph; Jessica Robles.

English

Subjects Communication.
Other authors/contributors University of Washington. Communication. degree granting institution
000 04045nam a22003373i 4500
001 7386951
005 20170609163427.0
008 170419s2016    miu|||||bm   |||||||eng d
020 |a9781369171785
035 |a(MiAaPQD)AAI10162387
040 |aMiAaPQD|beng|cMiAaPQD|erda
100 1 |aMroczek, Kristine R.,|eauthor.
245 1 0 |aCompeting "Host" Discourses: Appropriation of Australian Aboriginal Culture in the Tourism Borderzones /|cMroczek, Kristine R.
264 1 |aAnn Arbor : |bProQuest Dissertations & Theses, |c2016
300 |a290 p.
336 |atext|btxt|2rdacontent
337 |amicroform|bh|2rdamedia
338 |amicrofiche|bhe|2rdacarrier
500 |aSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: A.
500 |aAdvisors: LeiLani Nishime Committee members: Ralina Joseph; Jessica Robles.
502 |bPh.D.|cUniversity of Washington|d2016.
520 |aAs one of the largest global industries (WTTC, 2012), tourism is a powerful force in shaping intercultural knowledge (Bunten, 2010; Causey, 2003; Diamond, 2011). Through marketing and globally projected websites, government tourism authorities are often the dominant voice influencing outsiders' perceptions of the people and cultures of a tourism destination. These are particularly powerful narratives when the government uses indigenous peoples as a means to differentiate the nation from other tourism locations. These representations can perpetuate stereotypes of Aboriginal people for outsiders, while simultaneously influencing how those living within the tourism destination see themselves and their place in society (cf., Adams, 2006; Little, 2004). This project examines the Australian tourism industry and how Aboriginal art and culture are used to mediate national (and Aboriginal) identity.
520 |aIn a place that has incorporated Aboriginal fine art into their national identity, it is a particularly intriguing place to examine how Aboriginal art is upheld as part of the national culture, when in many ways Aboriginal people have been removed from the equation. I interrogate the centers of power by comparing the dominant tourism industry's representations of Aboriginal art and culture, to the narratives and semiotic productions of Australian tourism intermediaries on the ground. I am interested in those less studied but equally important moments where local tourism "hosts" not working for the government tourism authority produce their own representations for tourism. I use critical discourse analysis and semiotic approaches to analyze Tourism Australia and their affiliates' websites, my field notes taken during participant observations and interviews, transcribed recorded interviews, and tourism arts labeling.
520 |aI approach this project with a critical intercultural communication lens, where culture is not just a neutral concept, nor is it essentialized as part of the nation, but it is "always and already implicated in power relations where differently positioned subjects and social entities (e.g., the nationstate) compete for advantage and control of the process of meaning production" (Halualani, Drzewiecka, & Mendoza, 2003 in Halualani & Nakayama, 2011). I argue that there are competing "host" discourses that are constructing---as well as de- and co-constructing---Aboriginal culture for the Australian tourism industry. The various hosts' stakes are foregrounded through these (re)presentations constructed for the tourism industry. In addition, I demonstrate how hosts communicating from the "bottom up" are powerful participants in producing self-representations through Aboriginal culture that resist the dominant tourism authority's narratives.
546 |aEnglish
650 4 |aCommunication.
710 2 |aUniversity of Washington.|bCommunication.|edegree granting institution.
720 1 |aLeiLani Nishime|edegree supervisor.
773 0 |tDissertation Abstracts International|g78-02A(E).
852 8 |bMIC|hmc 252 10-162387
984 |aANL|d77000000676706
close Can I borrow items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close What can I get online?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

close Can I get copies of items from the Library?

You need Flash player 8+ and JavaScript enabled to view this video embedded.

You can view this on the NLA website.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Flags
Aboriginal, Torres Strait Islander and other First Nations people are advised that this catalogue contains names, recordings and images of deceased people and other content that may be culturally sensitive. Please also be aware that you may see certain words or descriptions in this catalogue which reflect the author’s attitude or that of the period in which the item was created and may now be considered offensive.